For two years, the excuse presented for the fact that somehow a Democrat-controlled White House and Congress had such difficulty actually getting anything done (how long did that health care bill take again?) was because of the Party of No. Well and good. The Republicans definitely took an aggressive stance in that, and while I'm not fond of that sort of tactic, one has to concede that it was at least effective from their standpoint. You could call it obstructionism if you liked, I suppose, but whatever you think of it, it's hard to argue that it worked against them at the polls, which is, in American politics, the only goalpost that matters.
Of course, now state legislatures in Indiana and Wisconsin go into more or less open revolt, by fleeing into neighboring states in the dark of night, and refusing to come back and present a quorum. Now none dare call it obstructionism, because of course that would make it seem as if the conservative wing had the moral high ground. And that will never, ever be acceptable to most of those who report the news, and nor, I imagine, to many who read it. No, a prominent Wisconsin Democrat had the gall to say that it was the governor who was holding up the works of government, and not the fourteen who decided they didn't want to play anymore.
The indignant protests over the rights of unions are, of course, justified. Those who have descended on the Wisconsin state house have every right to protest, though I tend to think that they could find a better way to go about it, and certainly they seem intent on fulfilling every nasty stereotype normally levelled at the Tea Party (strangely, nobody seems to pore over their pictures to see how many minorities are hiding in the crowd). That I happen to severely disagree with their viewpoints on, say, collective bargaining, is irrelevant. What, exactly, gives elected officials the right to absent themselves from their elected posts, just because they disagree? Guess what: every elected body in history has had people who disagree. When you do disagree, the solution isn't to run away and prevent business from being done. It isn't to offer up a slew of amendments to delay a vote you know that you will lose. It's not to point fingers.
No. Your job, and your duty, is to stand up, speak your mind, cast your vote, and sit back down. You really feel your issue is that important? Explain, in words clear and compelling enough to command the assent of the governed, your case, and if the voters agree, they'll say so in November. How it can be said that the Wisconsin governor is the sticking point is amazing, and I find it very hard not to consider the fourteen missing representatives very petulant, very immature teenagers who, seeing they won't be able to have their way, decide it can't possibly be their fault.
The irony, of course, is that in Washington, luminaries such as Nancy Pelosi are already setting the stage to blame the opposition for causing a shutdown of government. If representatives not showing up for a quorum isn't a government shutdown, then I can't think of what is.
Sadly, I fear that this sort of thing will become the norm, if it hasn't already. All that talk about new civility, and dialing back the hateful rhetoric? Yes, we see now just how sincere those calls were now, don't we?